Aden

Posted on August 25, 2020 / 900
Listing Type : Coaling Station
Location : Yemen

Prior to the British involvement in Aden this area was largely under the loose control of the Ottoman Turks, although local tribal leaders held effective day to day control.  The Turks built fortifications to defend the Crater area including a line of defence across the Isthmus to stop raids by tribal groups from the hinterland.  There was also a Southern Wall on the ridge line to south side of Crater running from near Seera Island.  At this time Steamer Point was of less interest, but as the size of vessels grew its’ anchorage became more important.

Aden was occupied by the British East India Company (BEIC) on 18th January 1839 as part of a campaign to stop piracy conducted against shipping transiting to India.  Aden was thereafter administered as Aden Settlement, part of British India.  Initially the British East India Company concentrated on protecting the urban areas and anchorages.  This saw defences constructed or enhanced in the following locations:

  • Isthmus Defences.  A new defence line, built closer to the mountain range between 1842 and 1848
  • The Main Pass and High Mussoorie defence line
  • Crater Defences including Seera Island
  • Steamer Point including a gun tower at Fort Morbat
  • Hejaf and Little Pass protecting the approaches to Steamer Point

Aden remained under BEIC control until 1858 when the British Imperial Government assumed responsibility for the defence of Aden.  This came about in the wake of the Indian Mutiny in 1857, with the passing of the Government of India Act which transferred power from the East India Company to the Crown.  It however did take time for the British authorities to embrace the defence of Aden in terms of being a priority and the day to day management very much remained with the British military authorities in Bombay, India.

While a useful naval base, Aden did not become a major priority until the Suez Canal opened in 1869 .  With the opening of the Canal, a naval force operating from Aden could effectively seal the entrance to the canal, thus preventing it being used by any enemy.  Aden also proved an ideal location for the steamships that need to replenish their coal bunkers and it became a coaling station.

The adjacent topographical map shows the main features of Aden.  As can be seen the Northern approaches are shielded by the Mussoorie and Johar ranges of hills which rise up to 136 metres. This provided the first line of natural defences, with only the Main Pass allowing easy access to the town area in Crater.   The Crater area was surrounded by a high circle of ragged hills, the Shum Shum Range which goes up to nearly 500 metres.  In the early years of British occupation this was the area of most commercial activity.  By the 1860s the Steamer Point area became more important because the adjacent anchorage allowed for larger vessels with deeper drafts.  This was protected in part by the range of hills running from Amunkal Peak down to Al Ainen and the Little Pass.  The redoubt at Amunkal Peak is at 250 metres. In the 1890 a separate defence line, with musketry positions, was built along this line of hills from Amunkal to El Hedjuf on the North coast.  Steam Point was protected by the two substantial fortifications, Ras Morbat and Tarshayne.

Topographical Map

Topo of Aden

Perim Island, which was also fell under British control, lay some one hundred and eight miles (174 km) to the West of Aden, and sat at the mouth of the Red Sea.  This small Island being three miles (5.6 km) by two miles (7 km)  was too small to be viable as a major base.  Perim Island  remained an outstation for Aden but was considered as a coaling station.  It did later have a small comercial coaling station here but its main use was a link to the undersea telegraphic cable from London to India.

The defence of Aden was considered in 1870, 1872, 1879 and 1881.  The Colonel Crossman report in June 1882 was accepted by the Royal Commission on the Defence of British Possessions and Commerce Abroad under the Chair of Lord Carnarvon. Steps were then taken to provide adequate coast  defences to Aden Settlement and its’ coaling facilities.

The adjacent map shows the location of the primary fortifications in Aden.  Not included on this map are:

  • Mole Battery situated below Fort Morbat. Initially five 32-pdr SB gun battery and then used as a saluting battery with six 12-pdr QF guns.
  • Seera Mole Battery on the North East of tip of Seera Island. Built in 1842 but not armed.

Also not shown is West Cliff Battery which was absorbed into Fort Morbat.

Fortifications of Aden

Map of Fortifications

The Isthmus Defences, originally built by the British East India Company, had limited artillery by 1869.  Returns show the armament then to be:

  • Victoria Battery 1 x 7-inch RBL
  • Left Demi Bastion no guns
  • Right Demi Bastion no guns
  • Right Redan 1 x 7-inch RBL

For General Defence the following armament was approved:

  • 2 x 40-pdr RML
  • 6 x 9-pdr RML
  • 7 x 7-pdr RML
  • 13 x 3-pdr QF
  • 10 x machine guns

1883 ARMAMENTS

Notes from Sir A Clarke, the Inspector-General of Artillery indicate that at this time (1883) Aden mount the following modern guns:

Fort Morbut, at this time was a two storied tower inside a masonry and earthwork line of defence with:

  • 2 x 9-inch RML guns
  • 1 x 7-inch RBL gun
  • West Cliff Battery just below the Fort with 4 x 9-inch RML

Fort Tarshayne with

  • 2 x 9-inch RML guns
  • 4 x 7-inch RBL guns

Additional artillery pieces were mounted at Hejaff (and Little Pass) Isthmus Defences and Crater Defences (see below).

The cost of works proposed for Aden were to be equally split between the British Indian Government and the Imperial Government. Thus it took some years to resolve exactly what fortifications should be built.  In January 1886 the following amended armament was agreed for Forts Morbut and Tarshayne as:

  • 5 x 10-inch BL guns
  • 12 x 6-inch BL guns
  • 12 x 12-pdr QF guns
  • 4 machine guns
  • 4 x 32-pdr SB BL guns for ditch defence
  • 6 x 8-inch howitzers as moveable armaments

Work on the Fort Tarshayne and Morbut commenced in August 1886 but the total cost of £270,000 caused concern to both the UK Treasury and Indian Government.  The final authorised estimate in 1887 was nearly half the original with the following costs:

Tarshayne and Morbut Forts    £103,160

Position Finding Cells                   £1,840

Minor works                                   £22,000

(These minor works were at El Hejar & Little Pass, El Ainah, Amum Khel, Sha Sham Signal Station, Road to Amun Khel)

Total                                                   £129,000

1894 ARTILLERY MOUNTED

By 1894 the fortifications had been completed with the following guns mounted:

Fort Morbut, with the old tower integrated into the new works.  Armed with:

  • 2 x 10-inch BL on HP mounts
  • 8 x 6-inch BL on HP mounts
  • 4 x 6-pdr QF

Fort Tarshayne armed with:

  • 3 x 10-inch BL on HP mounts
  • 4 x 6-inch BL on HP mounts
  • 2 x 7-inch RBL in casemates
  • 2 x 6-pdr QF

The Forts had machine guns in the caponiers, rather than the intended 32-pdr SB BL.  Fort Tarshayne had two machine guns while Fort Morbut had six machine guns.

The works built at El Hejaf were:

  • El Hejaf Battery with 1 x 9-inch RML and 2 x 25-pdr RML
  • El Ainah Battery with 2 x 9-inch RML
  • El Ainah Lower Spur 1 x 9-inch RML

The Crater Positions included:

  • High Mussoorie with no artillery
  • Seera Hill with 2 x 9-inch RML
    Related Listings